Hi Mark, Thanks for replying.
No, it has to be topLevel :-(I'm just getting back into town after a couple of days away and working my way through a stack of emails that have come in during my absence, so I'm replying directly to this instead of going to the list. Can you possibly open the stack window modally? That gets rid of the close box.
Yes, the window covers a lot of the screen, and it will most likely be running while other apps are being used, so I want to be able to minimize.
Also, I just did a test and set the controls of a stack from the Property Inspector to "title" and it did the same thing. Do you need to have the minimize and maximize buttons available?
In the end, I have decided to leave the close box, but treat it as if the user had decided to quit completely.
Cheers, Sarah
-- -Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, April 7, 2004, 4:26:21 PM, you wrote:
SR> Does anyone know how I can get rid of the close box in a stack window
SR> with Windows XP? In Mac OS X, I can set the decorations to
SR> "title,menu,maximize,minimize" which gives me exactly what I want with
SR> a close button visible but disabled. In Windows XP, no combination of
SR> settings seems to disable or hide the close box except if you remove
SR> "menu" from the decorations, which I don't want to do since it removes
SR> everything.
SR> Does any Windows expert out there know how I can hide the close box? I
SR> don't want to just trap the message and refuse to close the window as
SR> that would cause confusion, but I really don't want the users to be
SR> able to close a particular window unless they are quitting the entire
SR> application.
SR> TIA, SR> Sarah
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
