Thanks! That was very helpful and solved a usability issue. Kevin
-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=- Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) --- On Wed 05/12, wrote: From: [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 07:21:10 EDT Subject: Re: Confused? "visable" and "go" >Okay, I just realized somthing I do not understand. I have a sub-stack>called Logger >it is loaded (or at least shown in the Application Browser).> When I "get" it's >visible property it is true. Now this stack has no>desktop presentation so I assumed >(incorrectly as I now know) that this>property would be false (since it is not >shown). How else would one find>out if a particular stack is shown (has a desktop >presentation)? >>>>K'Closed' and 'visible' are, as you have discovered, not mutually >exclusive. Use the mode property to determine if a stack is closed...if the mode of >stack "Logger" = 0 >then/H_______________________________________________use-revolution mailing [EMAIL >PROTECTED]://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
