I will give it a try.
-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=- Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) --- On Tue 05/11, Malte Brill < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: From: Malte Brill [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 13:45:39 +0200 Subject: Re: # "go" without focus Hi Kevin,<br><br>>However, I do not want it to steal focus.<br><br>try something like this<br><br>put the focusedObject into theObject<br>go stack "yourOtherStack"<br>do "focus on" && theObject<br><br>Best, <br><br>Malte<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>[EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br> _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
