Alex- Wednesday, June 9, 2004, 7:03:24 PM, you wrote:
AT> Often. But that's not a counter-example; that's an example of using the AT> wrong operator and the language design not helping to spot it; not an AT> example of using the correct operator, which is the problem here. As I said AT> - it caught me out mostly because string operations are so unusual. Trying your example of: myVar = 1 gives me: Type Expression: double binary operator Object Button 1 Line myVar = 1 Hint = I don't see where this falls into the category of "the language design not helping to spot it". Even with the buggy error handler. It's annoying, and I'm constantly typing stuff like this and having to correct myself, but it *does* get caught. -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
