I would be very interested in you blowfish encryption. Kevin
-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=- Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) --- On Fri 06/11, Mark Brownell < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: From: Mark Brownell [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:43:00 -0700 Subject: Re: Encryption or SHA - URGENT PLEASE <br>On Friday, June 11, 2004, at 09:23 AM, Geoff Caplan wrote:<br><br>> We URGENTLY need a recognised 2 way encryption algorithm - has anyone<br>> done one please? Don't have time to do it from scratch.<br><br>What do you mean by recognized 2 way encryption algorithm. I mean will <br>you be encrypting with a Rev application but decrypting with a standard <br>version of something like Blowfish within the openSSL libraries? I ask <br>because if you are in the USA I can send to you a transcript based <br>Blowfish_CBC version that I created.<br><br>Let me know,<br><br>Mark<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>[EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br> _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
