Just realized the error of my ways. It seems that if the threeD property is set afert the showBorder the border is obscured by the draw routine.
Kevin -==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=- Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) --- On Wed 06/23, K < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: From: K [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 03:39:45 -0400 (EDT) Subject: threeD and showBorder <br><br><br>I like for my complicated data entry forms to have a paper form look & feel. Normally I accomplish on Win32 using Visal C++ by changing the field from flat to 3D when the mouse enters the field and back to flat upon exit. I am attempting to do the same using RR. However, the showBorder property is getting in the way. When a field is displayed in RR with the 3D property set there is actually no border but it must be true for the 3D effect to be present. When I set the threeD property to true/false a nasty black rectangle shows up. Any ideas?<br><br>Kevin<br><br><br><br><br>-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-<br>Disclaimer:<br><br>Any resemblance between the above views and those of my<br>employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely<br>coincidental. <br>Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.<br><br> The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold<br>them<br>is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of<br>the reader<br> is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. <br>(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the<br>scope of this article.)<br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com<br>The most personalized portal on the Web!<br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>[EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br> _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
