On Jul 14, 2004, at 8:16 PM, Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote:
...How is accessing an unopened stack different than using "go invisible"?
It's loaded into memory, but there's no window for it. (Just like a stack whose destroyStack is false, after you close it... it's still in memory even though it's closed.)
There seem to be some differences in compiling and loading externals, too.
Dar Scott
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
