The editScript message is a after the fact process. I need to munge the script prior
to it being set. Since the script with my macros is not necessarily valid and may
encounter several if a multitude of errors. I was wondering if I could place a
setProp/getProp handler in the front scripts to intercept the script upon storage and
retrieval. This would allow me to expand/collapse the code.
setProp script aScript
local tExpanded
--
--Munge script and expand macros
--
--
--Now here is the real problem will the call to set the script
--go to the appropriate object since this is a front script?
--
set the script to tExpanded
end script
getProp script
local tCollapsed
local tScript
--
--Now here is the real problem will the call to set the script
--go to the appropriate object since this is a front script?
--
put the script into tScript
--
--Munge tScript into tCollapsed
--
return tCollapsed
end script
Kevin
-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-
Disclaimer:
Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
coincidental.
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.
The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
them
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
the reader
is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient.
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)
--- On Tue 08/10, Dan Shafer < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: Dan Shafer [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:45:01 -0700
Subject: Re: the script
Might be possible. Check out using editScript message<br><br>on editScript
theObject<br> -- do some stuff to the script<br> -- which usually means you put the
script into a variable,<br> -- munge the text in the variable<br> -- and then set
the script of the object to the variable<br>end editScript<br><br>On Aug 10, 2004, at
12:56 PM, K wrote:<br><br>><br>><br>> Actually, I would like to alter "the script"
itself before validation <br>> and it being saved to the object (stack, card or
button). Also modify <br>> upon retreival.<br>><br>> Basically, I would like to use
my own parse tree to validate the code <br>> and produce a MACRO/Preprocessor for my
code.<br>><br>> Kevin<br>><br>><br>> -==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-<br>>
Disclaimer:<br>><br>> Any resemblance between the above views and those of my<br>>
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely<br>> coincidental.<br>>
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is <br>> non-dete
rministic.<br>><br>> The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone
to <br>> hold<br>> them<br>> is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of
the existence of<br>> the reader<br>> is left as an exercise for the second god
coefficient.<br>> (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond
the<br>> scope of this article.)<br>><br>><br>><br>> --- On Tue 08/10, Dan Shafer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:<br>> From: Dan Shafer [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>> To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:52:43 -0700<br>>
Subject: Re: the script<br>><br>> Not clear what you mean here, Kevin. You don't
"intercept" properties <br>> <br>as such. Do you mean you want to override the script
or are you <br>> trying <br>to intercept the editScript message?<br>On Aug 10, 2004,
at <br>> 6:40 AM, K wrote:<br><br>><br>> Is there any way to intercept "the <br>>
script" ptoperty for all objects?<br>>
<br>> Kevin<br>><br>><br>><br>> <br>>
-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-<br>> <br>> Disclaimer:<br>><br>> Any
resemblance between the above views and <br>> those of my<br>> employer, my terminal,
or the view out my window are <br>> purely<br>> coincidental.<br>> Any resemblance
between the above and <br>> my own views is <br>> non-deterministic.<br>><br>> The
question of <br>> the existence of views in the absence of anyone to <br>> hold<br>>
<br>> them<br>> is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the <br>>
existence of<br>> the reader<br>> is left as an exercise for the <br>> second god
coefficient.<br>> (A discussion of non-orthogonal, <br>> non-integral polytheism is
beyond the<br>> scope of this <br>> article.)<br>><br>><br>><br>> <br>>
_______________________________________________<br>> Join Excite! - <br>>
http://www.excite.com<br>> The most personalized portal on the <br>> Web!<br>>
____________________________________________
___<br>> <br>> use-revolution mailing list<br>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>> <br>>
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use- <br>>
revolution<br>><br>><br>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br>D <br>> an
Shafer, Revolutionary<br>Author of "Revolution: Software at the <br>> Speed of
Thought"<br>http://www.revolutionpros.com for more <br>> info<br>Available at Runtime
Revolution Store <br>> (http://www.runrev.com/RevPress)<br><br><br>><br>>
_______________________________________________<br>> Join Excite! -
http://www.excite.com<br>> The most personalized portal on the Web!<br>><br><br>
_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
