I've spent a good bit of time with XUL. It's pretty cool for what it tries to do but it's very limiting and a poor dev choice because of a lack tools for creating the UI.

Dan

On Aug 12, 2004, at 11:53 AM, Andre Garzia wrote:


On Aug 12, 2004, at 3:43 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:

MisterX wrote:

Anyone heard of a good fla[sh] file format source/parser lately?

No, but I found a good non-proprietary replacement: <http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/>

With CSS, JavaScript, DOM, and SMIL all operating as subsets under the SVG umbrella, there's little one can't do with SVG.

Parsing it is a snap: it's all XML. Delivering it efficiently is a snap: gzip-compressed delivery is part of the spec.

have you folks looked into XUL? it's very cool... And any mozilla based browser supports it out of the box.


for a little Demo, try the Mozilla Amazon Browser at http://mab.mozdev.org/ just click on "Try Mab 1.2". You must try it with a mozilla based browser, I just tried it with firefox on my MacOS 10.3.5 and it worked nice. It brings good UI to browsers, I think it's a good way to go for webapps when you can't deploy a netapp...

Andre



-- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation ___________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


--
Andre Alves Garzia  2004
Soap Dog Studios - BRAZIL
http://studio.soapdog.org

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to