On 8/15/04 5:20 PM, "Richard Gaskin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While #670 describes only a limited implementation and still has a good > many necessary properties undefined, it's a fair start and got my 5 votes. > > There are more complete specs posted previously to the improve-rev list > -- Ken, do you have those? Should they be posted to #670 or would that > broaden the scope of that requst too much? I don't happen to have them handy. I'll see if I can scare 'em up, and if I can, I'll add it to #670. Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
