On 8/17/04 6:24 PM, "Dar Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 17, 2004, at 4:46 PM, Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote: > >> "Call" seems fine to me in this context. (After all, it's why the call >> command is called that, and not the "invoke" command, or...) >> >> You could also say that doSomething sends a doThis message. > > OK, but how do I describe this: > > on doSomething > doThis > call "doThat" of button "A" > send "doOther" to button "B" > end doSomething > > If I use "call" or "send" to describe what doSomething does with > doThis, how do I describe what it does with doThat and doOther? Would > "of" and "to" in such a description imply what I want?
Personally, I'd say: "doSomething" executes the "doThis" handler "doSomething" calls the "doThat" handler of button "A" "doSomething" sends the "doOther" message to button "B" HTH, Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
