I agree with Dan that I like the approach; just not the number. Judy
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Dan Shafer wrote: > One more thing. An arbitrary review period measured in ACTUAL time of > usage rather than some number of days passing is, IMNSHO, a very smart > and helpful thing. I can't tell you how many trial programs I've > downloaded, looked at, figured they were worth a deeper look, and went > back to some period of time later only to find that not only had the > demo expired without my having time to get to know the product, but > downloading a new time-limited demo wasn't feasible because of the way > the publisher handled the lockout. > > With Dreamcard, you could, e.g., open the product, watch a video or > two, download the PDFs, then quit Rev, print out the PDFs and go read > them at your leisure. Come back some arbitrary time later and try > another video or even poke at building something that was described in > one of the PDFs. > > Ten may not turn out to be the right number, but the approach seems to > me to be very wise. I congratulate RunRev for this decision and predict > it will pay large dividends. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
