I would like to re-phrase my question:
Which is best (faster to set-up) creating xml documents from runrev using the revAddXMLNode or RevAppendXML or hand coding? On 9/11/04 11:15 AM, "Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been studying the excellent example stack xml-treeview and the runrev > documentation and as far as I can tell it is easier to generate a new xml > document by just hard coding > > Put "<NOTICE xmlns:xsi=" & quote & > "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance & quote & "> > <NOTICE_DETAILS>" & return & > "<CREATED_DATE_TIME>" & fld date & </CREATED_DATE_TIME>" after mynewXML > ...ect > > > There are lots of cool functions in the library but (like revAddXMLNode or > revAppendXML ) it seems like it would be more complex to use them. Does > anyone have a sample stack showing the building of an xml document from > runrev that I could pull apart? What I am doing is converting MySQL data to > an XML document. > > Bill > > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > > | | | )_) )_) )_) )___))___))___)\ )____)____)_____)\\ _____|____|____|____\\\__ -------\ /--------- http://www.bluewatermaritime.com ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^ ^^ ^^^^ ^^^ 24 hour cell: (787) 378-6190 fax: (787) 809-8426 Blue Water Maritime P.O. Box 91 Puerto Real, PR 00740 _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
