At 18:04 17/09/2004 -0400, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
Excellent!
Thank you both, that works perfectly.
Is this behavior to be expected, or should this be bugzilla'd? I would think of this as a bug, but I did a quick search and came up empty...
This is the expected behaviour (though I didn't expect it - and still get it wrong on a regular basis :-)
URL operate like a high-precedence operator - so it will bind more tightly than the "&" following.
I ran into this and asked a couple of months ago .... see Jeanne's reply at http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2004-July/039678.html
-- Alex.
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
