Geoff Canyon wrote: > Actually, the more I think about it, the more I like your original > proposal of a custom property for this. CantModify has a more general > purpose and would be (somewhat) overloaded serving in this capacity, I > think.
Richard Gaskin wrote: > cantModify could work too, as it has in other xTalks for years. Cantmodify does not support plugins that need to be modifiable such as Scripter's Scrapbook. EITHER revTools immunises all plugIns automatically by testing their location, OR it immunises any stack whose mode is not '1' (i.e. toplevel modifiable), OR it honours a revBlessed custom property. I frankly don't care which, but the situation at present is broke. /H _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
