I am attempting to exec() several different unix applications. I have written a external to does a double fork() exec() and alllows communication via stdin and stdout (buggy at the moment). I would like to use open process since that is the generally supported method. Previously the suggested fix was to use shell() however it is hardly interactive.
Kevin -==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=- Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) --- On Tue 09/28, Ken Ray < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: From: Ken Ray [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:23:11 -0500 Subject: Re: Does open process work on OS X now? Well, open process has always worked on OS X AFAIK - are you using it to<br>launch an application, or is there something else you've been trying to do<br>that you weren't able to do?<br><br>Ken Ray<br>Sons of Thunder Software<br>Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/<br>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>[EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br> _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
