From: Richard Gaskin I think GarageBand (and dozens of other similar specialized packages) shows that tightly synchronized sound is not impossible. In not sure where the notion of "impossible" started in this thread.
The question for RunRev is how important is it to provide the tools for making a GarageBand while we still have annoyances like unusual selection handle behaviors for line objects or the inability to reliably use "answer file" on OS X (not to mention that GarageBand already exists and is very well done).
I might be very interested in this thread if I knew for sure what it's about, as I'm interested in developing music UI's for enableware,
IOW, GarageBand is great for what it does, but a severely disabled person couldn't use it alone. That's where totally custom manipulation of sound, graphical interfaces, and game/controller sprockets come into play.
Sounds very useful. When it comes to more specialized uses for QT, the answer is one word: Trevor. ;)
Trevor, I know you have nothing but time on your hands -- got anything in the hopper for managing this sort of thing?
What are the chances of giving this thread a real name?
I did my best with the improv above, but it's been so long since this thread had a name I haven't a clue what it was born as.
-- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation ___________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
