Due to several bugs including the disappearing object bug I am still using 2.2. I have found 2.5 to be just a bit unstable.
K -==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=- Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) --- On Thu 10/21, Derek Bump < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: From: Derek Bump [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:23:21 -0600 Subject: Re: shell() bug in standalone > And what version of Rev? If it's in 2.5, did you try 2.2?<br><br>Version 2.5. No, > I didn't try 2.2. I'll try it tommorow, and if it works I'll be saying to myself > "Figures, I finally use the upgrade, and the older buggier version is actually the > better way to go!"<br> <br><br>Derek Bump<br>Dreamscape > Software<br>____________________________________________<br>Compress Images Easily > with > JPEGCompress<br>http://www.dreamscapesoftware.com<br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution > mailing list<br>[EMAIL > PROTECTED]<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br> _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
