One thing is to show/point them to good enterprize or at least presentation level apps built with Rev. This is like showing cars then pointing to the factory and saying "they build that". We should get more case studies online and explain why Rev was a superiour tool for the task.
Also judy, I think you can bind them to your classes if you focus on THE-Enviroment, like showing them how one can adapt it's own enviroment to suit/automate it's tasks thus gaining productivity. I for example have Revolution on my startupItens and lot's of apps running inside the IDE, yes, I never make them into standalone, they suit me in the IDE. Rev is my html page editor, my scheduler, my programming enviroment, my ftp browser, my notepad and to some extend my process controller. Since they are all "sharing" the same enviroment, they can share data, since I built almost all my tools, I make them aware of each other and data sharing is a snap. With the aid of RevHTTPd (libNetServices) I am even able to control my Revolution IDE (just to activate or desactivate some handlers on stacks) from the net. And there's no way in earth one could do it on another tool!!!! except for may be lisp/scheme but guis in lisp sucks (this is personal opnion)
andre -- Andre Alves Garzia 2004 Soap Dog Studios - BRAZIL http://studio.soapdog.org
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
