On Nov 10 2004, at 12:42, thierry wrote:
Hi,
BvG> On Nov 07 2004, at 23:46, DJ Grumble wrote:
BvG> note: this is the hard way, with datagramm sockets its way simpler, but
BvG> that's the way i would do it :)
out of curiosity :-) what would be simpler with Datagramm ?????
With datagram sockets you don't need to care about delimiters, also the connection scheme is simpler, as you normally don't use as much callback messages:
--server button: on mouseUp accept datagram connections on port 8181 with message "Connected" close socket theIP end mouseUp
on connected theIP theMessage put theMessage after field "Your field here" end connected
--client field: on returnInField open datagram socket to "localhost:8181" write the text of me & return to socket "localhost:8181" close socket "localhost:8181" end returnInField
otherwise, can someone tell me the pros and cons of communicating
between revolution and an outside program using "the open process" versus
open socket
( the outside program reads few properties
from revolution during the execution and then write to some others... )
please, nothing to do with the shell() command.
the environment is Win98, NT and XP
<>()<>()<>()<>()<>()<>()<>()<>()<>()<>()<>
official ChatRev page: http://chatrev.cjb.net:8080
Chat with other RunRev developers: go stack URL "http://homepage.mac.com/bvg/chatrev1.2.5.rev";
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
