Thanks, Scott. I think it should work. I had thought about using the transparent portions of a rectangular image that way with the intersect function but transparencies don't work that way apparently with that function but they do with another and with respect to mouse events. :(
I'll have a look at it. Thanks again! Judy On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Scott Rossi wrote: > Recently, Judy Perry wrote: > > > I think I've come across a situation in which I really will need an > > irregularly-shaped button. It's for using the intersection function; it's > > okay for one of the objects to be rectangular but not the other as it > > represents 'obstacles' on an orthoscopic map. > > > > Any ideas? > > If you need to simulate collision detection with an irregular object/edge, > you could use the within() function to test a point location within a > transparent image. The within() function will only return true when the > point is within an opaque region of the image. > > Would that work? _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
