on 15/12/04 2:19 pm, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote > Not a particularly useful script, but notice the lack of blank lines > between the handlers?
Fair point - I guess that's a coding style that I've never run across, but it's certainly legal code. > As for 'range comments', yeah, that's okay until you try to comment out > a handler which already contains a 'range comment': That's why I suggested >> (I don't know whether /* */ comments nest; if not then Comment Handler should >> disable internal occurences, eg changing to "/--*" and "*--/", and Uncomment >> Handler reverse this.) But fundamentally, my point is that having scripts compile with random junk in them is very 20th century, and we should no longer accept it. Everything else is just suggestions for how we can alleviate the, in any case not that great, loss of convenience for those who had got used to taking advantage of this to support a lazy way of commenting out a handler (a way which is already no longer safe, as has been observed). Ben Rubinstein | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cognitive Applications Ltd | Phone: +44 (0)1273-821600 http://www.cogapp.com | Fax : +44 (0)1273-728866 _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
