On Dec 16, 2004, at 4:05 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
An alternate approach might be something that translates a stack into a bunch of subgroups of a group.
Precisely. It would ideally work in both directions.
It might be, if there are many rough edges and gotchas, that this would have to be considered a tool that does 95% of the work during design time and the designer must clean up the rest. The building the stack might be considered an easy way to spec the fancy group.
An alternate approach I have pondered is a control that puts a picture of some card of the stack in an image an collects events to the image and distributes them to the stack. The stack might be open, but invisible. Maybe the work in repeatedly taking pictures is too heavy and if you take pictures only after events, then moving and pulsating gets lost.
Dar Scott
****************************************
DSC (Dar Scott Consulting)
http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
Programming Services and Software
****************************************_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
