>On Dec 18, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Martin Baxter wrote: > >> I had assumed that "of" was required in chunk expressions, but maybe >> it is >> optional, since this can hardly be an oversight.
> Dar Scott wrote: > >It seems to be optional in 2.5. > >I can't say if it is by design. It would be nice to know if leaving >out 'of' in chunk expressions is blessed by Revolution. It does make >chunks slightly harder to read. The long id returns text with 'of'. > >It does seem to be required in built-in functions. > It looks like it can be omitted from simple chunk expressions anyway. Like you I would like to know if this is official or not before I make a habit of it. Having spent many years religiously typing "of" in front of container identifiers, it might be hard to change. But, put item 2 line 3 field 1 does have a kind of rhythm to it. Martin Baxter _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
