Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2004, at 11:52 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > >> I've been updating WebMerge to take advantage of Rev 2.5's improved >> support for native XP appearances -- so far not bad: >> <http://www.fourthworld.com/wincolors.jpg> >> >> As you can see in that image, WebMerge's background color is the same >> as XP's background for the Display control panel and other UIs where a >> tab control is behind most of the other controls. >> >> While it looks OK to me, my beta testing customers have submitted >> reports saying the UI is "too light"; the previous version of WM used >> the Win95 appearance with its dark, dank gray. ... >> So do I conform to Micro$oft and face the wrath of customers, or >> conform to the customers and face the wrath of reviewers? > > Why not do both? By default use the M$-specified colors, but provide > an option for users to specify the color they want, overriding the > specs provided by Microsoft? > > That should keep both groups reasonably happy.
Of course! Brilliant and simple.
Thanks.
-- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation __________________________________________________ Rev tools and more: http://www.fourthworld.com/rev _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
