On Dec 22, 2004, at 1:07 PM, Lynch, Jonathan wrote:
I have a stack I use to figure out Unicode numbers for various symbols - the one thing I found was that any use of Unicode in a field really requires that the whole field be in Unicode. Otherwise, it gets confused. Have others found this?
I was just about to send a comment on this.
I noticed that if textFont of the field is set to "Lucida Grande,Japanese", the unicode method I tried works.
It seems that otherwise, Revolution tries to separate the n from the combining character and put it outside of unicode.
It is weird using "Japanese" as the language for the font.
This now works:
on mouseUp set useUnicode to true set the textFont of field "field" to "Lucida Grande,Japanese" set the unicodeText of field "field" to numToChar(110) & numToChar(776) put the htmlText of field "field" end mouseUp
Dar ********************************************** DSC (Dar Scott Consulting & Dar's Lab) http://www.swcp.com/dsc/ Programming Services and Software **********************************************
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Lots of thanks to Richard, Dar, Jonathan and Frank. I now have a field exposing text with accented letters and the umlaut at the same time.
Merry Christmas to all the very helpful Revolutionies!
Best from Norway Signe Marie Sanne _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
