If anyone's at fault for flaming, it's Mr. Anon. Certainly, the points you make are correct, but please don't mistake your intimate knowledge of PC Plus and their prior business with you, for our (list members) familiarity with the same.
Anyone who starts a post:
"Let the flames begin!!
"Flame, flame, burning hot Rise up now and scorch the lot. Let the stench of flesh a-burning Leave them all with stomachs churning."
surely cannot be taken seriously as a contributor of fact to this list. Especially when considering he or she wishes not to be known at all. (Yeah, I too previously found 1 other post...big deal).
Knowing your reputation for fact and fairness, I believe you are surely correct in your assessment of the article, the one you obviously read. Neither I nor others have had access to the article. I did (as Thomas) Google the Magazine and the Author to find out as much as I could, then even asked for a URL here on the list, with no success. As one of the few users here with experience in VB, I would like to create a rebuttal letter to the article-- and I can't do it without reading it first.
Just as any profession, there are good reviewers, and those who are not. I, like you, prefer to do research on the magazine and author before deciding how best to reply (or not).
best,
Chipp
Richard Gaskin wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let the flames begin!!
I've been rather surprised by the reaction to the review excerpts posted here. While "webmailman" had been anonymous (and likely to remain so after the flaming), a simple search in the use-rev archives shows at least one prior post from that addrerss on a scripting issue. So it seems safe to say Mr. webmailman is a Rev scripter, not a troll.
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
