On Mon, 03 Jan 2005, Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
>>>> If you turn on the threeD property it should. What happens there when
>>>> you do it?
>
>>
>> Turning the threeD property on or off does not make a difference here.
Works like a charm here, providing the style is also changed to "shadow".
Anyone else not able to turn off XP rendering of a field by simply changing it to "shadow" and turning its threeD off?
-- Richard Gaskin
My intention was to have relief-like three-dimensional vertical and horizontal lines between the fields - as part of the visual design. This is achieved by immediately adjacent fields with the threeD property set to true.
This is why I then stumbled across the problem that with borderwidth 2 on WindowsXP you suddenly get transparent gaps between the fields.
Setting the shadow to true (with shadowoffset 0) does not make any difference here. And then, when I turn the threeD property off - irrespective of whether shadow is true or not - the transparent gap between the immediate adjacent fields indeed vanishes and you get a default black border around the field (unless you specify a different color), but the intended relief-like lines between the fields are not there - as you need threeD for that.
This is on WindowsXP Service Pack 2
Tuviah Snyder has confirmed Bugzilla 2508 in the meantime
Regards,
Wilhelm Sanke
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
