Michael D Mays wrote:
But what is the advantage of returning the offset from the last offset rather than the offset from beginning?
Don't know; I'd agree there are probably more cases where an "overall" answer would be more convenient, but I don't see that it makes any great difference. I can't think of any significant case where the "relative" result is easier to use.
I think I do need to insert put zero into t after the first repeat and before the second repeat.
Or just move the existing
put zero into t
from before the first repeat to immediately after it (before the second repeat)
-- Alex.
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.1 - Release Date: 19/01/2005
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
