On Feb 24, 2005, at 1:58 PM, Raymond E. Griffith wrote:
Well, in Program Philosophy I am an "intelligent design" advocate. If a
program isn't intelligently designed, it doesn't matter that someone created
it.
That was why Hypercard got a bad name. There was lots of creationism, but
not as much intelligent design.
Which is why, I've always suspected, HC was put on the v-e-r-y s-l-o-w upgrade path and then abandoned altogether by Apple. Far too easy for us commoners to make buggy, bad-looking apps that ran poorly. And as home-brewed stacks got a bad name, what parent company was going to get a bad name by association?
Mark
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
