Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, curry  wrote:


It's hard to believe, and a bit troubling, that the majority of
responses to my report about Rev 2.5 crashing on OS 10.1 have been
suggestions for me to upgrade. I'm sure this is meant well, but it's
not relevant. When I posted that I thought surely this is obvious
enough to need no long and drawn-out explanation


One question that would be worth asking is, do the Rev folks in fact support
10.1, or is the 10.0.3 a holdover spec that fell through the cracks as the
Rev engine and the Rev Web site have been updated.  It may be that they
don't officially support it.

They would be in good company. It seems a majority of apps list their system req's as "10.2 or later."


OS X 10.1 was a very buggy beta.  ;)

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___________________________________________________________
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]       http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to