Yes, and I know I brought up the issue some time ago with respect to the educational community, in which Win 98 or even Win95 can be a deployment issue.
I had to deploy my master's project stack on old Windows with I think something like either 32 or 64 MG RAM. Tops. As in, "extremely painful". (and this was higher ed!) Now, I don't have some funny insistence that Rev support Win 3.11 or Mac OS 6.x, but I'd like to have some sorts of "heads-up" that, 'while Win98 is supported, you'll wish that it wasn't' advice. ;-) Judy On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, graham samuel wrote: > Curry, FWIW when I had an issue with RunRev on Windows 98 I got some > similar responses - one of which pointed out that Microsoft itself had > abandoned the OS - but I knew that there were many people out there > wanting to use my stuff that were still using W98 and likely to > continue for some time. > > What I think RR might perhaps do is to give developers (us) some > pre-warning of their intention to drop an old OS or an old minimum > system requirement like RAM or screen size - saying for example you've > got 6 months to persuade your customers to upgrade. This could be > useful from a marketing point of view, I think. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
