I hate to repost, but on the odd chance someone here might have some info and could save me some testing time, this would be really helpful to me and possibly others:

Does anyone know how using Rev as a CGI stacks up against Perl, Python,
etc. in terms of server resource usage for equivalent tasks?

In brief, is Rev more efficient, less efficient, or roughly on par with other scripting languages for CGI use?

I have some fairly extensive processes to implement involving reading large (10-30 MB files) and generating a lot of small files after churning that data. I'm hoping I can demonstrate that using Rev's nifty chunk expressions will make for an efficient solution that won't drag the server down any more than most other options for this sort of thing.

TIA -

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___________________________________________________________
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]       http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to