Klaus, Awesome!
But this doesn't solve a problem with the conversion of dates to dateitems prior to 1970s! I'll bugzilla that I think! Shouldn't the centurycutoff be defaulted to 00? I would seem more logical... regards, Xavier On 09.03.2005 17:00:56 use-revolution-bounces wrote: >>Try this one: >>... >>set the centurycutoff to "00" >>sort lines of fld "dateIndex" datetime descending by item 1 of each >>... >> >>Works here for me: >> >>01/06/1908 xyz... >>01/09/1908 >>01/10/1908 >>01/10/1932 >>01/12/1998 >>01/12/1999 >>01/01/2000 >>01/05/2003 >>01/01/2004 >> >>> Is this a bug? >> >>I am afraid this is a feature (of some sort...) ;-) > >Danke Klaus! Good going! > >Now im much less confused - but still scared of this feature! > >cheers >Xavier > > >----------------------------------------- >Visit us at http://www.clearstream.com >IMPORTANT MESSAGE Internet communications are not secure and therefore >Clearstream International does not accept legal responsibility for the >contents of this message. The information contained in this e-mail is >confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the >addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any views expressed in this e-mail are >those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states >them to be the views of Clearstream International or of any of its >affiliates or subsidiaries. END OF DISCLAIMER >_______________________________________________ >use-revolution mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
