On 3/14/05 9:12 PM, "Robert Brenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/14/05 6:38 PM, "Robert Brenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is the logic of having a background within a background? Is this supported? What would be the message passing?
Well, technically speaking, having a "background" (i.e. a group with backgroundBehavior=true) inside another "background" *is* supported, but it doesn't gain you anything... the embedded group would be shared along with like the main group regardless of the embedded group's backgroundBehavior property.
Message passing would be:
objects in embedded group -> embedded group -> main group -> card
What about messages sent to objects in parent group and objects on card?
Those would bypass the objects in the embedded group and the embedded group itself. Messages sent to the parent group (what I called the "main group") would be:
(message) -> main group -> card
Ken Ray
Ken, aren't you thinking of normal groups? Isn't it normally the other way around that background (bg group) gets messages after the card? Wouldn't it follow that in both cases the sub-background should get them all? But then should it get them also when message was sent to another background?
Robert _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
