Hi Jaqueline and Mark,
On 3/23/05 3:03 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Ken-
Wednesday, March 23, 2005, 8:58:13 AM, you wrote:
KR> I think that if Rev were modified so that it would not accept unquoted
KR> strings to be assigned to variables we'd be in a much better place, and it
KR> wouldn't give aid to "sloppy" (IMHO) programming.
Menu:
Edit | Preferences | Script Editor | Variable checking by default
Why this isn't on by default is beyond me except that it would force
many programmers to clean up their code. If this had been left to me,
I wouldn't even have made it an option.
Thank god, i has not been left to you!
And you would have reaped the ire of those involved in 20 years of xtalk legacy. ;)
For those of us who have used all the various forms of xtalk over lo these many years, the lack of variable typing and the ability to use variables without first declaring them is a major breakthrough feature of a modern programming language.
I still do not declare variables except under some rare specific instances. I consider it a freedom.
YES! Freedom of choice.
When I read scripts written by those who do declare lists of locals inside their handlers, it looks messy to me and I wonder why they don't just go off and use Basic where it is a requirement. All that "dimming" really puts me off.
Is it sloppy programming to use a language as it was intended?
Amen to this, sister :-)
C'mom Mark, show a bit of tolerance to scripters who are not coming from "dogmatic" programming languages like C etc nor do have a "programming" background at all like me...
And just relax or play some rounds of "nine ball"* :-)
*It has declared locals, if that will help you to relax...
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
Regards and happy Easter
Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.major-k.de
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
