On 3/31/05 1:12 PM, "Dan Shafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Other than that, I can't think of any reason not to use custom > properties exclusively. Well, one is that custom properties can be saved with stacks, and therfore hold persistent data, whereas globals disappear as soon as the application is disposed of. Another is that you can get the list of active globals in one command, whereas trying to get the list of all the custom properties that you've used instead of globals would require identifying them by name. However with that said, I use a mixture of globals and custom properties and I'm migrating more of my "global use" to custom properties as time goes on... Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
