Mark,
Yes, this is what I am going to do.
Thanks, Dennis
On Apr 13, 2005, at 1:37 PM, Mark Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2005, at 07:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might be able to suffer with the
chunk specification for the line#, then use a repeat for each item and
put 2500 items in an array. That way I will only need 2500 array items
at any one time instead of 125,000,000 array items per data file. But
I will still have to put 125,000,000 items into array elements and then
read them back out again once per data pass. Perhaps 10-100 times
slower than an "access" keyword instead of 1000-10,000 times slower. I
will do some sample tests and see what I come up with.
Dennis
Dennis,
I once used the split function to create almost instant arrays based on 1, 2, 3, etc... as the locations created by the split, ( I call them locations because I'm an old Director user.) This process could work well when you put "2500 items in an array." The split function creates the array without a loop process.
Mark
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
