Hi Jonathan, Richard and Frank and...
I benchmarked 3 methods: using a hidden field in the current stack, a field in unopened substack and the clipboard.
Apple G4 bi pro - 3 MB internet connexion
I requested 100 times the same URL for each method and each method 5 times in turn to minimize connexion hazards.
And the winner is...
1. Substack method: 1.000 2. Clipboard: 1.0354 3. Hidden field: 1.079
Best,
Le 14 avr. 05, � 16:47, Frank D. Engel, Jr. a �crit :
Plus this changes the content of the clipboard to something the user will not expect, which is a bad idea for a released software product. One must minimize unrelated use of the clipboard in order to maximize its usefulness.
On Apr 14, 2005, at 10:40 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
IIRC when I benchmarked both appproaches last year, if memory serves the field method (on an unopened card) was surprisingly faster than the clipboardData method.
Any got time to run such tests again to verify?
Amicalement,
Eric Chatonet. ---------------------------------------------------------------- So Smart Software
For institutions, companies and associations Built-to-order applications: management, multimedia, internet, etc. Windows, Mac OS and Linux... With the French touch ---------------------------------------------------------------- Web site http://www.sosmartsoftware.com/ Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ Phone 33 (0)1 43 31 77 62 Mobile 33 (0)6 20 74 50 86 ----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
