--- Dar Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On May 1, 2005, at 3:30 AM, Jan Schenkel wrote: > > > I personally prefer the try-throw-catch trinity, > as it > > makes for cleaner code than indented if-then-else > > structures. > > If a library errors comes in only the result, then > you can do this: > > moveRobot robotName, plan > get the result > it it is not empty then throw it > > Instant thrown errors. > > Dar >
Ah yes, but then I have to check the result myself to throw an error, and that's what I wanted to avoid ;-) My earlier suggestion is backwards-compatible but allows people who like try-throw-catch, to structure their code in a more readable way. Jan Schenkel. Quartam - Tools for Revolution <http://www.quartam.com> ===== "As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time." (La Rochefoucauld) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
