LISP is purely functional, not object-oriented. There are OO libraries for LISP, but many on the LISP side of things look down on them.

I'm not sure how to catalog Forth, but it's not OO (inherently -- there are OO implementations). It's procedural, certainly, but the inherent stack gives it a definite functional feel.

On Apr 30, 2005, at 11:48 AM, Dan Shafer wrote:

Forth is one of two programming languages I have tried to learn with complete lack of success. The other is LISP. Both are object- oriented (at least Forth is in some implementations and LISP is purely).

_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to