Geoff and All,
And in about polymorphism... : HC and REV are full able to let us design any complexes recursive procedures we can need inside our xtalk's apps, even in using polymorhism, hash-tables stuffs and so on...
Best, Pierre
Le 2 mai 05, � 16:28, Geoff Canyon a �crit :
I think by that classification Rev _is_ object-oriented: "ObjectOrientedProgramming. A program execution is regarded as a physical model, simulating the behavior of either a real or imaginary part of the world." Sounds like Rev to me.
Nevertheless, I always refer people to another quote on the same web site -- Ward Cunningham's regarding HyperCard and OO: "Sure HyperCard is object oriented. You just don't get to pick the objects."
Setting those aside, Rev lacks several characteristics most people consider inherent to OO. That doesn't make it bad or good, necessarily.
On Apr 30, 2005, at 7:51 AM, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
A quick Google search reveals this, which may be helpful as far as classification of languages:
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?NygaardClassification
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
