This BZ on arrays would be a welcome enhancement, but it would not
improve the speed of processing arrays. I was thinking along the
lines of a high speed array processing instruction subset. They
would be less flexible than what we have now --the nice flexible data
types, dynamic memory allocation, and flexible key names are what
costs the operators so much time to execute. Just let me define the
dimensions and data size for a fixed memory allocation and provide
operators that work on fixed data types. It should fly through the
array calculations at least ten times faster. I just entered a BZ
request for it. If you agree, vote.
BZ# 2813
Dennis
On May 4, 2005, at 3:13 PM, MisterX wrote:
the question mark made it red!!!
<http://support.runrev.com/bugdatabase/show_bug.cgi?id=555>
works better ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Gaskin
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 21:08
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: To Rev or not to Rev
Gordon Webster wrote:
I totally agree with Dennis. Efficient arrays are the
missing link in
rev.
<http://support.runrev.com/bugdatabase/show_bug.cgi?id=555?>
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
__________________________________________________
Rev tools and more: http://www.fourthworld.com/rev
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
