Re: Table Field Docs?

Tue, 10 May 2005 13:19:02 -0700

I don't know if would be correct to call it flaky as much as undocumented. It might work incredibly well. It might work perfectly if we knew how to do it right. So I'll wait for Eric's demo stack.

At 9:12 PM +0100 5/10/05, Peter Reid wrote: 
Hi All

Thanks for all the responses to this.

Looking at Chris' stuff below it seems clear that the table field is very much a "project in progress"!

I think I'll keep well away from it for now as it looks far too flaky for reliable use. Once RunRev have a fully worked out table object, then I'll jump 
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to