Howard Bornstein wrote:
Very nice, Howard, very nice, even on my 1 Ghz G4 :-)

But the choppiness Richard (and me!) experienced was a result of
changing also the
height/width of the image at the same time, something you cleverly left
out :-)

With it it is still a bit jerky...

Agreed! I changed the motion because it was more in keeping with my idea about how the Ken Burns Effect works, and it did look better!

It's a bit of both: the Ken Burns Effect commonly combines a zoom with a pan, so emulating it precisely would require changing the image's rect -- a much more computationally expensive action than moving the image.


I wonder if Trevor's been reading this thread and has come up with an external to hook into QT transitions while executing computationally-expensive Transcript without impairing either....
(I can dream, can't I?)


--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 __________________________________________________
 Rev tools and more: http://www.fourthworld.com/rev
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to