Rob,
Put a comma in front of it ,1,2,3,4,5 and it makes sense.
Dennis
On Jun 4, 2005, at 10:44 PM, Rob Cozens wrote:
Ken, et al,
The
reason you get two different values is that in your first example,
the list
if items is "1,2,3,4,5," and ends in the item delimiter (,). Since
there is
nothing that follows the item delimiter, it is ignored, and
returns 5 items.
The second example gives you ",1,2,3,4,5" so there are 6 items
(nothing's
ignored).
From my perspective, the focus of JB's issue is not the presence or
absence of a terminating comma, but if (the number of items of
"1,2,3,4,5,") is 5, why does (sort items of "1,2,3,4,5," ascending
numeric) sort 6 values instead of 5?
It appears the sort command's definition of an item is different
than the "number of items of" syntax.
Comments?
Rob Cozens, Staff Conservator
Mendonoma Marine Life Conservancy
"It is contrary to human welfare to contribute in any way...
to the degradation of the sea's capacity to support life."
-- Walter Hickel, U. S. Secretary of the Interior, 1971
in "From Abundance to Scarcity" by Michael L. Weber
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
