John Ridge wrote:
on 12/6/05 1:21 pm, Alex Tweedly wrote :
***************************
Thanks, Alex - of course it's "the result" that I want - but I still like my
syntax! What language am I half-remembering?
I liked your syntax too - though it did require a certain amount of
clairvoyance or mind-reading to determine which file you wanted the
"eof" test to apply to :-)
It certainly feels familiar - but can't remember which it's most likely
to be. Some Pascal variant, maybe ?
I've tried another method that I thought might be faster - instead of
reading a chunk at a time and popping it into a field on a new card, why not
gulp the whole file into a variable, then get each item as a chunk?
In fact it's slower. Ah well...
That is kind of surprising.
If it's convenient, could you send the two sets of code so I can see
what the differences are, please ?
--
Alex Tweedly http://www.tweedly.net
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.6.8 - Release Date: 11/06/2005
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
