If you're storing these lines as strings of hexadecimal numbers, then
bear in mind that Revolution is still seeing them as regular strings,
so you may need to replace whatever hexadecimal string represents a
line delimiter explicitly.
Cheers,
mark
On 19 Jun 2005, at 19:31, Michael Young wrote:
Mark,
Correct. It does not work. I still get the same trailing garbage that
is apparently part of the CRLF that I added myself. The garbage is
%0d, which I think is 13 when converted from hexadecimal to decimal,
meaning that CR is sticking around for some reason.
Michael
Not sure if I fully understand what you're trying to do, but does
'replace CRLF with empty in <chunk>' really not work?
Mark
On 19 Jun 2005, at 16:35, Michael Young wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions for all who responded, but I have not had
success yet.
I noticed an interesting subtlety that is of course NOT full
explained
in the documentation.
1. Reference Documentation for Object using Filter with: does not
show
item hilitedText. It does show selectedText function entry with
apparently second line alternate name hilitedText.
2. Reference Documentation for Dictionary using Filter with with:
does
show both hilitedText and selectedText entries. The problem is the
hilitedText entry is the exact same as the selectedText entry.
3. hilitedText is not in the selectedText function See also: section
presumably because they are considered one and the same.
4. line x suggestion also has the CRLF still present. It made no
difference whether list behavior was true or false.
I still haven't figured out how to get rid of the CRLF that I added.
Very frustrating.
Michael
On Jun 19, 2005, at 2:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Michael
There's different ways to get a line...
get line x of field f will give you the line selected without the
crlf.
or
get the selectedtext of fld f -- if the list is not listbehavior
or
get the hilitedtext of fld f -- if the list is listbehavior
Normally, you just need to add cr, not crlf - as far as i know, rev
takes
care of the right line delimiter in displays.
cheers
Xavier
Hello,
I have added CRLF to end of lines in a Scrolling Field for
cosmetic effect. Now I want to strip off the CRLF for a user
selected line (although the last line in the Scrolling Field
will not have CRLF).
What is the simplest way to strip off the CRLF, if present? I
have not been able to stumble on the answer or find it in
documentation or list archives. Oh well. I am sure the
solution is simple.
Thanks,
Michael
OS X 10.3.9
RR 2.6
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
