Richard Gaskin wrote:
At present there are more dozens of prolific tool authors for the Rev community, and the number grows every month. There are a handful of issues with the development and deployment of tools that are common to all, and by choosing to adopt a few fully-optional rules about how things are put together we can collectively ensure robust and reliable performance for all of them.
This brings up a question I've had. I think of Rev as being an interesting way for one person to hack out a small tool/program, but I have trouble seeing how one would make a large application, for a number of reasons. One has to do with the fact that I see no way to create true objects and classes, both visual and non-visual. Another has to do with libraries: I don't see how one would create such a thing and then use it. And there is the name space issue, which may be handled adequately, but perhaps not exceptionally.
Are there resources that explain how one can think about moving beyond the trivial programs to something more substantial?
Thanks! Jon _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
