Dar- Thursday, June 23, 2005, 10:40:06 AM, you wrote:
DS> Commands in xTalk follow the English implied-you imperatives. The DS> deviation from that to a descriptive of the dataflow does not fit. I DS> come from a functional programming background, but I accept the DS> imperative style. Exactly. The verbose xtalk form makes the assignment unambiguous, where C, for example, had to resort to the confusing "==" operator in order to disambiguate things. -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
